Eric Larson (not verified) on January 19, 2007 - 10:17am.
EC2 can run an image doing the proxying and if you keep all the data on S3 you transparently grant access for each instance of the worker EC2 images. In a sense it somewhat locks you in to using S3 and EC2, but for some it really makes sense.
Otherwise, I agree, the bandwidth used by utilizing your own server as dispatcher could be expensive in itself.
EC2 can run an image doing the proxying and if you keep all the data on S3 you transparently grant access for each instance of the worker EC2 images. In a sense it somewhat locks you in to using S3 and EC2, but for some it really makes sense.
Otherwise, I agree, the bandwidth used by utilizing your own server as dispatcher could be expensive in itself.