<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python Web-Application Hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hostingfu.com/article/python-web-application-hosting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/python-web-application-hosting</link>
	<description>Web Hosting Blog by a Software Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter byrd</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/python-web-application-hosting/comment-page-1#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>walter byrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=52#comment-250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the article: &quot;Python Web-Application Hosting.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to use frameworks like django or turbogears for python web-development, but it&#039;s so frustrating to find decent hosting. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMO: those frameworks were developed without regard to hosting realities. For example: turbogears requires python 2.4 - not 2.3 and not 2.5. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can get PHP5 hosting for $10 a year (dollar-hosting.net). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In many respects Python is a better language than PHP. Python could be as popular, or even popular for web-development as PHP. But Python developers just don&#039;t get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the article: &#8220;Python Web-Application Hosting.&#8221; </p>
<p>I would like to use frameworks like django or turbogears for python web-development, but it&#8217;s so frustrating to find decent hosting. </p>
<p>IMO: those frameworks were developed without regard to hosting realities. For example: turbogears requires python 2.4 &#8211; not 2.3 and not 2.5. </p>
<p>I can get PHP5 hosting for $10 a year (dollar-hosting.net). </p>
<p>In many respects Python is a better language than PHP. Python could be as popular, or even popular for web-development as PHP. But Python developers just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
