<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nginx vs. Lighttpd for a small VPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps</link>
	<description>Web Hosting Blog by a Software Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Configure Hunchentoot Behind Nginx &#8211; kadir pekel</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Configure Hunchentoot Behind Nginx &#8211; kadir pekel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>[...] has not been solved yet (#758). Also you should read a post about nginx vs .lighttpd comparison here. For more information please refer to the survey of web server usage statistics at netcraft because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has not been solved yet (#758). Also you should read a post about nginx vs .lighttpd comparison here. For more information please refer to the survey of web server usage statistics at netcraft because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Balasuriya</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Balasuriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>BTW Scotty - how about an updated article on this ? OR just an experts view on setting up NginX? We would be well up for that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Scotty &#8211; how about an updated article on this ? OR just an experts view on setting up NginX? We would be well up for that :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Balasuriya</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1672</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Balasuriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1672</guid>
		<description>We have switched all our production and hosted customer sites over to NginX - Seems lighttd is in it&#039;s last throws...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have switched all our production and hosted customer sites over to NginX &#8211; Seems lighttd is in it&#8217;s last throws&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bop</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Bop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>@Björn - so it is stalled then ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Björn &#8211; so it is stalled then ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Björn Lindqvist</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>Björn Lindqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>No it hasn&#039;t stalled, but there hasn&#039;t been any major release for over three years. But the lighty 1.5 rewrite that was undertaken sometime in 2006 still hasn&#039;t delivered any releases. The 1.4 release line is actively maintained though, with the 1.4.26 release as late as Feb 26, 2010. I&#039;d still take nginx over lighty any day because of the much faster development speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it hasn&#8217;t stalled, but there hasn&#8217;t been any major release for over three years. But the lighty 1.5 rewrite that was undertaken sometime in 2006 still hasn&#8217;t delivered any releases. The 1.4 release line is actively maintained though, with the 1.4.26 release as late as Feb 26, 2010. I&#8217;d still take nginx over lighty any day because of the much faster development speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knight online</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>knight online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>The progress of Lighttpd development seems to be stalled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The progress of Lighttpd development seems to be stalled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Guy</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>LOL @ Debianero Rumbero comment #46 in response to #45. Hugo wrote Hiawatha so he knows best =) Nice server by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL @ Debianero Rumbero comment #46 in response to #45. Hugo wrote Hiawatha so he knows best =) Nice server by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Light Weight Web Servers (Light weight alternatives to apache) &#171; Shabir Imam&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Light Weight Web Servers (Light weight alternatives to apache) &#171; Shabir Imam&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>[...] two most popular free, open source light weight web servers. Comparison between these two servers: http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps http://superjared.com/entry/benching-lighttpd-vs-nginx-static-files/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two most popular free, open source light weight web servers. Comparison between these two servers: <a href="http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps" rel="nofollow">http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps</a> <a href="http://superjared.com/entry/benching-lighttpd-vs-nginx-static-files/" rel="nofollow">http://superjared.com/entry/benching-lighttpd-vs-nginx-static-files/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debianero Rumbero</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Debianero Rumbero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>Note: Sorry, there&#039;s a source tarball for Linux ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: Sorry, there&#8217;s a source tarball for Linux ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debianero Rumbero</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps/comment-page-1#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>Debianero Rumbero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=81#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>@Hugo, Hiawatha only supports officially MacOS X, Windows and FreeBSD packages.

There isn&#039;t official Linux package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hugo, Hiawatha only supports officially MacOS X, Windows and FreeBSD packages.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t official Linux package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
