<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Birthday DreamHost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost</link>
	<description>Web Hosting Blog by a Software Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-1#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-257</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How do you &quot;know&quot; that a host is overselling?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You don&#039;t. Because they all do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even the ones that swear to Zarquon that they never ever oversell, at least one of their upstream ISP do anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How do you &#8220;know&#8221; that a host is overselling?</p></blockquote>
<p>You don&#8217;t. Because they all do.</p>
<p>Even the ones that swear to Zarquon that they never ever oversell, at least one of their upstream ISP do anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-1#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too use unison to manage all my sites (including this one). Unison keeps a checksum of all files in a cache file under ~/.unison/, and I found when there are &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; files to manage, unison can be slow trying to work out what has changed and what hasn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far it is alright -- I don&#039;t have many files on DreamHost, only large media files to take advantage of storage + data transfer. However I hope it will not be too slow when I need to sync many smaller files...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too use unison to manage all my sites (including this one). Unison keeps a checksum of all files in a cache file under ~/.unison/, and I found when there are <em>many</em> files to manage, unison can be slow trying to work out what has changed and what hasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So far it is alright &#8212; I don&#8217;t have many files on DreamHost, only large media files to take advantage of storage + data transfer. However I hope it will not be too slow when I need to sync many smaller files&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Church</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>F Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 11:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Unison is not so bad once after the initial sync. Only new files are uploaded, and changed ones are updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unless video and music files are involved, there is only so much typing a human being can do in a day, hence updates are minimal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I run Unison from batch files, and I find it quicker than opening an ftp client, looking up both source and dest directories and uploading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I get the batch files, pick the -path I want to restrict to and let it run&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unison is not so bad once after the initial sync. Only new files are uploaded, and changed ones are updated.</p>
<p>Unless video and music files are involved, there is only so much typing a human being can do in a day, hence updates are minimal.</p>
<p>I run Unison from batch files, and I find it quicker than opening an ftp client, looking up both source and dest directories and uploading.</p>
<p>I get the batch files, pick the -path I want to restrict to and let it run</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Finds Guy Behind the Scenes</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Finds Guy Behind the Scenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 22:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-255</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I keep reading about hosts who are overselling. Any host that seems to offer a large amount of disk space and bandwidth is said to be overselling. How do you &quot;know&quot; that a host is overselling? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep reading about hosts who are overselling. Any host that seems to offer a large amount of disk space and bandwidth is said to be overselling. How do you &#8220;know&#8221; that a host is overselling? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Many shared web hosting companies actually have TOS forbidding the storage used for backup purpose. Surprisingly DreamHost does not &quot;yet&quot; have that. I wonder whether it will change when more people take advantage of their massive storage and use them for offsite backups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is running unison slow for you? Sync&#039;ing 100Mb of small files can take a &lt;em&gt;long time&lt;/em&gt; for me...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many shared web hosting companies actually have TOS forbidding the storage used for backup purpose. Surprisingly DreamHost does not &#8220;yet&#8221; have that. I wonder whether it will change when more people take advantage of their massive storage and use them for offsite backups.</p>
<p>Is running unison slow for you? Sync&#8217;ing 100Mb of small files can take a <em>long time</em> for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Church</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>F Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On their lowest plan the space amounts to 4 cents a Gig. Compared with Amazon S3&#039;s 15 cents a Gig and it seems quite reasonable if they will allow you to fill it up.
I guess the CPU overhead involved in managing that amount of storage might affect a users CPU allocation eventually&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the case of the dedicated servers I suppose the space taken up by a dedicated server is at worth at least $400 a month to them, so it has to be that high.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have to admit liking the facilities offered by their shell access. It allows me full command line without having to bother about server administration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now if only they remain true to their space offerings and if running up to a dozen long running rsync or unison processes would not exceed the CPU quotas per account, I could put their space  to good use as backup space for some of my stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On their lowest plan the space amounts to 4 cents a Gig. Compared with Amazon S3&#8242;s 15 cents a Gig and it seems quite reasonable if they will allow you to fill it up.<br />
I guess the CPU overhead involved in managing that amount of storage might affect a users CPU allocation eventually</p>
<p>In the case of the dedicated servers I suppose the space taken up by a dedicated server is at worth at least $400 a month to them, so it has to be that high.</p>
<p>I have to admit liking the facilities offered by their shell access. It allows me full command line without having to bother about server administration.</p>
<p>Now if only they remain true to their space offerings and if running up to a dozen long running rsync or unison processes would not exceed the CPU quotas per account, I could put their space  to good use as backup space for some of my stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff C. @ DreamHost</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/happy-birthday-dreamhost/comment-page-1#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff C. @ DreamHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=53#comment-251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Jeff C. @ DreamHost&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! :)</p>
<ul>
<li>Jeff C. @ DreamHost</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
