<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Domain Name Resolution with OpenDNS + Local Cache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache</link>
	<description>Web Hosting Blog by a Software Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tahder</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>I used to use the OpenDNS, but it didn&#039;t work form me. I am using an Ubuntu Server 9.10, i have a static ip but i don&#039;t have an domain name except in OpenDNS. My questions is how do i able to configure it in linux? Do i need to change the hostname of my Ubuntu to my domain that i got from OpenDNS? or just that DNS you have given to put in /etc/resolv.conf? Our ISP do have also a DNS? should i add or totally/ only 208.67.220.220 and  208.67.222.222?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use the OpenDNS, but it didn&#8217;t work form me. I am using an Ubuntu Server 9.10, i have a static ip but i don&#8217;t have an domain name except in OpenDNS. My questions is how do i able to configure it in linux? Do i need to change the hostname of my Ubuntu to my domain that i got from OpenDNS? or just that DNS you have given to put in /etc/resolv.conf? Our ISP do have also a DNS? should i add or totally/ only 208.67.220.220 and  208.67.222.222?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;to avoid single-point of failure, check out codns (http://codeen.cs.princeton.edu/codns/)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to avoid single-point of failure, check out codns (<a href="http://codeen.cs.princeton.edu/codns/" rel="nofollow">http://codeen.cs.princeton.edu/codns/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John -- sorry I have just noticed. Your comment been flagged as spam by Akismet. No idea how that happened...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8212; sorry I have just noticed. Your comment been flagged as spam by Akismet. No idea how that happened&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, I see your reply to my initial comment, but I don&#039;t see my comment live?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I see your reply to my initial comment, but I don&#8217;t see my comment live?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Josh -- I agree about that during development you often have to force a flush. However it&#039;s good that you can actually force a reload in this setup, whereas you can&#039;t if you just use your ISP&#039;s recursive DNS :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John -- At the end I want to check whether a domain exists or not. In shell I just try to resolve its A or NS records, and I prefer to see NXDOMAIN than OpenDNS&#039;s records coming back. There are also many different domain name based RBL, where I just can&#039;t assume that OpenDNS has a exception for them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also typo correction gives you an indeterministic result when you perform test on inputs, if input is a hostname/domain name. Not good if you are building an application that relies on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the end I see typo correction only useful for web browsing, as the correction is done by forwarding the HTTP traffic to your web server. I understand that it provides OpenDNS&#039;s revenue stream, and I&#039;ll use it on my desktop, but no so with servers that I am hosting applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh &#8212; I agree about that during development you often have to force a flush. However it&#8217;s good that you can actually force a reload in this setup, whereas you can&#8217;t if you just use your ISP&#8217;s recursive DNS :)</p>
<p>John &#8212; At the end I want to check whether a domain exists or not. In shell I just try to resolve its A or NS records, and I prefer to see NXDOMAIN than OpenDNS&#8217;s records coming back. There are also many different domain name based RBL, where I just can&#8217;t assume that OpenDNS has a exception for them.</p>
<p>Also typo correction gives you an indeterministic result when you perform test on inputs, if input is a hostname/domain name. Not good if you are building an application that relies on it.</p>
<p>At the end I see typo correction only useful for web browsing, as the correction is done by forwarding the HTTP traffic to your web server. I understand that it provides OpenDNS&#8217;s revenue stream, and I&#8217;ll use it on my desktop, but no so with servers that I am hosting applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shasyng</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>shasyng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;could u tell me step by step on how to configure my personal windows based email server&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could u tell me step by step on how to configure my personal windows based email server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, very well-written and detailed article. Wow. Thanks from all of us at OpenDNS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you detail the programs you&#039;re running which depend on NXDOMAIN?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve done some work to return NXDOMAIN (regardless of preference) for all requests to SURBL.org and URIBL.com and a few similar domains.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The point? We don&#039;t think it will be necessary to turn off typo correction in most situations, and we want to remove the need whereever possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So knowing what programs (besides some blacklists on mailservers) need special treatment would be welcome, especially since you have such an insight into the hosting world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Roberts
OpenDNS&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, very well-written and detailed article. Wow. Thanks from all of us at OpenDNS.</p>
<p>Could you detail the programs you&#8217;re running which depend on NXDOMAIN?</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve done some work to return NXDOMAIN (regardless of preference) for all requests to SURBL.org and URIBL.com and a few similar domains.</p>
<p>The point? We don&#8217;t think it will be necessary to turn off typo correction in most situations, and we want to remove the need whereever possible.</p>
<p>So knowing what programs (besides some blacklists on mailservers) need special treatment would be welcome, especially since you have such an insight into the hosting world.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>John Roberts<br />
OpenDNS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Skidmore</title>
		<link>http://hostingfu.com/article/fast-domain-name-resolution-with-opendns-local-cache/comment-page-1#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Skidmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hostingfu.com/?p=85#comment-456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great article. I was actually playing with dnsd on my local network the other day, and incredibly, it can speed up OpenDNS even more. Being a web developer though, I already find myself having to use their CacheCheck service often and introducing a new DNS element to my local network is just another area for me to have to &quot;flush&quot; if I assume a domain is up and running before it actually is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Josh&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Great article. I was actually playing with dnsd on my local network the other day, and incredibly, it can speed up OpenDNS even more. Being a web developer though, I already find myself having to use their CacheCheck service often and introducing a new DNS element to my local network is just another area for me to have to &#8220;flush&#8221; if I assume a domain is up and running before it actually is.</p>
<p>-Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
